Farm Subsidy information
Crawford County, Wisconsin
Total Subsidies in Crawford County, Wisconsin, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 41 to 60 of 3,029
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in Crawford County, Wisconsin totaled $114,496,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
41 | Lomas Farms LLC | Wauzeka, WI 53826 | $341,875 |
42 | Tracy Pedretti | Prairie Du Chien, WI 53821 | $338,432 |
43 | Lowell Kapinus | Prairie Du Chien, WI 53821 | $334,838 |
44 | Daryl B Aspenson | Gays Mills, WI 54631 | $322,088 |
45 | Schwert Farms | Gays Mills, WI 54631 | $318,819 |
46 | Beneker Farms Inc | Prairie Du Chien, WI 53821 | $308,973 |
47 | Jeffrey A Werthwein | Gays Mills, WI 54631 | $287,131 |
48 | G W Schreiner Trust | Rock Falls, IL 61071 | $276,514 |
49 | Citron Valley Farm LLC | Boscobel, WI 53805 | $271,587 |
50 | Charles G Fisher | Eastman, WI 54626 | $271,539 |
51 | John G Oppriecht | Ferryville, WI 54628 | $269,886 |
52 | Dutch Ridge Acres | Friendship, WI 53934 | $267,498 |
53 | John M Ducharme | Wauzeka, WI 53826 | $264,704 |
54 | Edwin Richard Folbrecht | Wauzeka, WI 53826 | $253,534 |
55 | Arlen Latham | Soldiers Grove, WI 54655 | $253,511 |
56 | Peterson Farms | Eastman, WI 54626 | $253,469 |
57 | Craig Forde | Ferryville, WI 54628 | $250,636 |
58 | Donald J Boland | Gays Mills, WI 54631 | $248,715 |
59 | Gerald Oppriecht | Eastman, WI 54626 | $246,262 |
60 | Patricia A Forde | Ferryville, WI 54628 | $245,117 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”