Loan Deficiency in Crawford County, Wisconsin, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 628
Recipients of Loan Deficiency from farms in Crawford County, Wisconsin totaled $5,357,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Loan Deficiency 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
1 | Thomas J Kozelka | Prairie Du Chien, WI 53821 | $291,978 |
2 | Aspenson Farms Inc | Eastman, WI 54626 | $226,018 |
3 | Janet E Kozelka | Prairie Du Chien, WI 53821 | $131,767 |
4 | Childs Valley Farms Inc | Gays Mills, WI 54631 | $107,788 |
5 | Gale Beneker | Prairie Du Chien, WI 53821 | $105,891 |
6 | Richard Larsen | Wauzeka, WI 53826 | $104,587 |
7 | Daryl B Aspenson | Gays Mills, WI 54631 | $90,763 |
8 | Pomerening Farms Inc | Wauzeka, WI 53826 | $81,962 |
9 | Larry E Kapinus Sr | Prairie Du Chien, WI 53821 | $77,370 |
10 | Arlen Latham | Soldiers Grove, WI 54655 | $76,740 |
11 | Leonard R Olson | Gays Mills, WI 54631 | $74,239 |
12 | Olaf A Leirmo | Ferryville, WI 54628 | $74,161 |
13 | John E Leirmo | Ferryville, WI 54628 | $74,161 |
14 | Busy B Farms Inc | Gays Mills, WI 54631 | $69,904 |
15 | Citron Valley Farm LLC | Boscobel, WI 53805 | $65,788 |
16 | Donald J Mcguire | Prairie Du Chien, WI 53821 | $55,572 |
17 | Donald W Dudenbostel | Steuben, WI 54657 | $46,941 |
18 | Ervin H Eick | Ferryville, WI 54628 | $43,455 |
19 | Roger Granzow | Eastman, WI 54626 | $41,813 |
20 | Tracy Pedretti | Prairie Du Chien, WI 53821 | $39,282 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>