Total Commodity Programs in Crawford County, Wisconsin, 2019
Subsidy Recipients 41 to 60 of 339
Recipients of Total Commodity Programs from farms in Crawford County, Wisconsin totaled $2,972,000 in in 2019.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Commodity Programs 2019 |
---|---|---|---|
41 | Wedeberg Farms Inc | Gays Mills, WI 54631 | $19,479 |
42 | Hartley Farms | Soldiers Grove, WI 54655 | $19,386 |
43 | Larry E Kapinus Sr | Prairie Du Chien, WI 53821 | $17,374 |
44 | Craig Forde | Ferryville, WI 54628 | $16,761 |
45 | John M Ducharme | Wauzeka, WI 53826 | $16,124 |
46 | Alan P Flansburgh | Prairie Du Chien, WI 53821 | $14,938 |
47 | Alan J Hromadka | Prairie Du Chien, WI 53821 | $14,924 |
48 | Bradley J Linder | Prairie Du Chien, WI 53821 | $14,883 |
49 | Charles G Fisher | Eastman, WI 54626 | $14,867 |
50 | Carlin Dairy LLC | Boscobel, WI 53805 | $14,461 |
51 | Tracy Pedretti | Prairie Du Chien, WI 53821 | $14,409 |
52 | Myron A Dearth | Gays Mills, WI 54631 | $13,750 |
53 | Kathy Flansburgh | Prairie Du Chien, WI 53821 | $13,692 |
54 | Chad A Sime | Gays Mills, WI 54631 | $13,211 |
55 | John G Oppriecht | Ferryville, WI 54628 | $13,198 |
56 | Peterson Farms | Eastman, WI 54626 | $13,024 |
57 | Donald J Boland | Gays Mills, WI 54631 | $12,998 |
58 | Nathan A Prew | Eastman, WI 54626 | $12,977 |
59 | James A Moret | Prairie Du Chien, WI 53821 | $12,903 |
60 | Gerald Oppriecht | Eastman, WI 54626 | $12,777 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”