Margin Protection Program in Dane County, Wisconsin, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 243
Recipients of Margin Protection Program from farms in Dane County, Wisconsin totaled $3,135,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Margin Protection Program 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
21 | Richard R Endres | Dane, WI 53529 | $29,171 |
22 | Gerald L Gehin | Belleville, WI 53508 | $29,154 |
23 | G & N Endres Farms LLC | Waunakee, WI 53597 | $28,964 |
24 | Kellercrest Registered Holsteins Inc | Mount Horeb, WI 53572 | $28,782 |
25 | Gobel Dairy LLC | Belleville, WI 53508 | $28,699 |
26 | Maple Vane Dairy Inc | Waunakee, WI 53597 | $28,520 |
27 | R & G Miller & Sons Inc | Columbus, WI 53925 | $28,506 |
28 | Bryan Rauls | Deforest, WI 53532 | $28,109 |
29 | Kurt Dairy Farm LLC | Deerfield, WI 53531 | $28,106 |
30 | Endres Berryridge Farms LLC | Waunakee, WI 53597 | $27,989 |
31 | Ripp's Wauna-dairy Inc | Waunakee, WI 53597 | $27,874 |
32 | Tammy Jo Kruchten | Lodi, WI 53555 | $27,740 |
33 | Roger S Manthe | Deforest, WI 53532 | $27,714 |
34 | Dohm Farms LLC | Dane, WI 53529 | $27,685 |
35 | Virgil A Ripp | Dane, WI 53529 | $27,679 |
36 | Philip M Richards | Cross Plains, WI 53528 | $27,558 |
37 | Haag Dairy LLC | Dane, WI 53529 | $27,103 |
38 | Wipperfurth Dairy LLC | Dane, WI 53529 | $26,789 |
39 | Neil S Breunig | Lodi, WI 53555 | $26,671 |
40 | Blue Star Dairy Farms Partnership | De Forest, WI 53532 | $26,547 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”