Wool and Mohair Programs in Dane County, Wisconsin, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 41 to 60 of 64
Recipients of Wool and Mohair Programs from farms in Dane County, Wisconsin totaled $30,626 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Wool and Mohair Programs 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
41 | Thomas J Mescher | Verona, WI 53593 | $131 |
42 | Delbert G Schutz | Waunakee, WI 53597 | $122 |
43 | Ruth A Mcnair | Brooklyn, WI 53521 | $121 |
44 | Chris Derr | Sun Prairie, WI 53590 | $103 |
45 | Laverne Paskey | Cottage Grove, WI 53527 | $91 |
46 | Shelby Paskey | Cottage Grove, WI 53527 | $91 |
47 | Karen M Kaltenberg | Cottage Grove, WI 53527 | $78 |
48 | Robert Rademacher III | Deforest, WI 53532 | $73 |
49 | Lamoine V Haefer | Cottage Grove, WI 53527 | $71 |
50 | Clarence J Johnson | Edgerton, WI 53534 | $71 |
51 | Roy L Anderson | Blue Mounds, WI 53517 | $60 |
52 | Alan Rademacher | Sun Prairie, WI 53590 | $55 |
53 | Glenn Breunig | Sauk City, WI 53583 | $50 |
54 | Karen Reiner | Madison, WI 53718 | $45 |
55 | Earl Reiner Jr | Madison, WI 53716 | $45 |
56 | Darrell I Riley | Waterloo, WI 53594 | $43 |
57 | Elizabeth Riley | Waterloo, WI 53594 | $43 |
58 | Kathryn Stenjem Estate | Mc Farland, WI 53558 | $35 |
59 | Marc D Robertson | Mount Horeb, WI 53572 | $33 |
60 | Henry Best | Belleville, WI 53508 | $33 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”