Farm Subsidy information

Dane County, Wisconsin

Total Subsidies in Dane County, Wisconsin, 1995-2023

Subsidy Recipients 61 to 80 of 6,402

Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in Dane County, Wisconsin totaled $647,771,000 in from 1995-2023.

Rank Recipient
(* ownership information available)
Location Total Subsidies
1995-2023
61Roger S MantheDeforest, WI 53532$1,159,832
62Gary E ThalackerEdgerton, WI 53534$1,158,683
63Langer Dairy Farms LLCDeforest, WI 53532$1,158,419
64G & N Endres Farms LLCWaunakee, WI 53597$1,148,156
65Virgil A RippDane, WI 53529$1,118,225
66Ripp's Blue Ribbon DairyDane, WI 53529$1,095,549
67Duane P SwalheimCottage Grove, WI 53527$1,092,318
68Brian K RademacherCottage Grove, WI 53527$1,069,689
69Thomas L SutterBlue Mounds, WI 53517$1,067,969
70Schroeder Farms PtnshpDeforest, WI 53532$1,060,809
71Kellercrest Registered Holsteins IncMount Horeb, WI 53572$1,055,901
72Keith R RademacherCottage Grove, WI 53527$1,051,548
73D & D Olson Farms IncStoughton, WI 53589$1,047,505
74Maple Vane Dairy IncWaunakee, WI 53597$1,042,751
75Harris Dairy LLCDe Forest, WI 53532$1,042,376
76Jim Herman IncMarshall, WI 53559$1,039,154
77Alan RademacherSun Prairie, WI 53590$1,025,733
78Oakleaf PropertiesMarshall, WI 53559$1,007,861
79Robert P RiegeDeerfield, WI 53531$1,000,367
80Woodland Creek Dairy LLCWaunakee, WI 53597$995,107

* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.

** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”

<< Previous | Next >>

 

Farm Subsidies Education

AgMag