Livestock Disaster and Emergency Programs in Dane County, Wisconsin, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 61 to 80 of 763
Recipients of Livestock Disaster and Emergency Programs from farms in Dane County, Wisconsin totaled $2,323,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Livestock Disaster and Emergency Programs 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
61 | K & B Dairy LLC | Middleton, WI 53562 | $7,304 |
62 | Roger E Kurth | Columbus, WI 53925 | $7,205 |
63 | Steven A Sponem | Mount Horeb, WI 53572 | $7,133 |
64 | Allan G Breunig Jr | Sauk City, WI 53583 | $7,115 |
65 | T Waddell & Sons Inc | Marshall, WI 53559 | $7,088 |
66 | Jeffrey F Ballweg | Sauk City, WI 53583 | $7,043 |
67 | Bruce Sime | Stoughton, WI 53589 | $6,939 |
68 | Robert E Rademacher Jr | De Forest, WI 53532 | $6,921 |
69 | James C Koch | Deforest, WI 53532 | $6,908 |
70 | Mell-wood LLC | Waunakee, WI 53597 | $6,867 |
71 | Skaar Scattered Ac Inc | Stoughton, WI 53589 | $6,764 |
72 | Skalitzky Brothers LLC | Columbus, WI 53925 | $6,764 |
73 | Kurt Dairy Farm LLC | Deerfield, WI 53531 | $6,710 |
74 | Mulcahy Farms LLC | Dane, WI 53529 | $6,588 |
75 | Jerome J Zander | Mount Horeb, WI 53572 | $6,570 |
76 | Philip M Richards | Cross Plains, WI 53528 | $6,530 |
77 | Clifford Hageman | Fitchburg, WI 53575 | $6,516 |
78 | Midthun Bros LLC | Arlington, WI 53911 | $6,440 |
79 | Eugene C Henning | Marshall, WI 53559 | $6,386 |
80 | Thomas L Sutter | Blue Mounds, WI 53517 | $6,345 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”