Conservation Reserve Program in Dane County, Wisconsin, 1995-2023

Subsidy Recipients 121 to 140 of 2,608

Recipients of Conservation Reserve Program from farms in Dane County, Wisconsin totaled $68,022,000 in from 1995-2023.

Rank Recipient
(* ownership information available)
Location Conservation Reserve Program
1995-2023
121Louis M RoedellStoughton, WI 53589$110,607
122Duane - Duane L & Do SkaarDeerfield, WI 53531$109,933
123Kenneth L Zahler Testamentary TruBelleville, WI 53508$109,326
124Glenn J SpaayMount Horeb, WI 53572$109,299
125Esser Family TrustMadison, WI 53705$107,468
126Nancy C Hylbert Living TrustVerona, WI 53593$106,858
127Merle SkjolaasStoughton, WI 53589$106,102
128Gerald A BarteltBlack Earth, WI 53515$105,527
129Paul E UnderwoodBlue Mounds, WI 53517$105,040
130William L GansnerMount Horeb, WI 53572$104,581
131Kenneth D SchieldtStoughton, WI 53589$104,073
132Ruth Schulien RichardsonMount Horeb, WI 53572$102,868
133Martin L RichardsonMount Horeb, WI 53572$102,848
134Henry S AustinNew Glarus, WI 53574$101,763
135M G C CorporationMazomanie, WI 53560$101,320
136Konnie JerabekNew Richmond, WI 54017$101,051
137Merel BlackBlue Mounds, WI 53517$101,000
138Michael L HerfelVerona, WI 53593$99,484
139Gregory StamnVerona, WI 53593$99,097
140Gammeter Farm LLCCross Plains, WI 53528$99,089

* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.

** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”

<< Previous | Next >>

 

Farm Subsidies Education

AgMag