Farm Subsidy information
Dane County, Wisconsin
Total Subsidies in Dane County, Wisconsin, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 141 to 160 of 6,402
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in Dane County, Wisconsin totaled $647,771,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
141 | Thomas G Burns | Mount Horeb, WI 53572 | $743,280 |
142 | Meffert Homestead Inc | Waunakee, WI 53597 | $741,588 |
143 | Randy Knickmeier | Stoughton, WI 53589 | $741,124 |
144 | Dohm Farms LLC | Dane, WI 53529 | $740,966 |
145 | Gerald C Koch | Dane, WI 53529 | $738,377 |
146 | Viney Family Farms LLC | Cottage Grove, WI 53527 | $737,718 |
147 | Erika Klahn | Brooklyn, WI 53521 | $735,705 |
148 | Frederick E Porter | Sun Prairie, WI 53590 | $735,646 |
149 | Tts Kalscheur Dairy LLC | Waunakee, WI 53597 | $730,189 |
150 | James E Treinen | Deforest, WI 53532 | $722,303 |
151 | T Waddell & Sons Inc | Marshall, WI 53559 | $719,740 |
152 | Gobel Dairy LLC | Belleville, WI 53508 | $719,244 |
153 | Gilbert Rauls | De Forest, WI 53532 | $717,743 |
154 | Zander Family Farm Inc | Mount Horeb, WI 53572 | $716,609 |
155 | Steven A Laufenberg | Mount Horeb, WI 53572 | $716,039 |
156 | Perry J Halverson | Deerfield, WI 53531 | $709,681 |
157 | William Hoffman | Columbus, WI 53925 | $701,127 |
158 | Robert Hollfelder | Cross Plains, WI 53528 | $698,758 |
159 | Duane Garfoot | Mount Horeb, WI 53572 | $696,958 |
160 | Joseph R Ripp | Dane, WI 53529 | $691,564 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”