Conservation Reserve Program in Dane County, Wisconsin, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 181 to 200 of 2,608
Recipients of Conservation Reserve Program from farms in Dane County, Wisconsin totaled $68,022,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Conservation Reserve Program 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
181 | Joseph Collins | Dane, WI 53529 | $86,574 |
182 | Ruth K Hoff | Ann Arbor, MI 48103 | $86,428 |
183 | J David Stanfield | Blue Mounds, WI 53517 | $85,737 |
184 | Steven Frame | Blue Mounds, WI 53517 | $85,669 |
185 | Wayne A Linnerud | Cambridge, WI 53523 | $85,649 |
186 | Little Norway Inc | Blue Mounds, WI 53517 | $84,744 |
187 | Paul Fankhauser | Madison, WI 53718 | $84,400 |
188 | Nicholas D Morschauser | Lake Mills, WI 53551 | $83,720 |
189 | Sheldon W Sweet | Madison, WI 53705 | $83,452 |
190 | Daniel Levine | Oregon, WI 53575 | $83,253 |
191 | Carla J Wright | Cross Plains, WI 53528 | $82,882 |
192 | Kermit Skogen | Mount Horeb, WI 53572 | $82,674 |
193 | Kay M Butcher | Black Earth, WI 53515 | $82,666 |
194 | Rice Family Partnership | Mount Horeb, WI 53572 | $82,292 |
195 | Norman O Hanna | Belleville, WI 53508 | $82,282 |
196 | Roger & Ralph Werndli Ptr | Mount Horeb, WI 53572 | $82,017 |
197 | Joseph R Ball | Mount Horeb, WI 53572 | $81,657 |
198 | Wayne H Meitner | Marshall, WI 53559 | $81,649 |
199 | Julie L Olson | Cambria, WI 53923 | $81,402 |
200 | David Hoisington Sr | Oconomowoc, WI 53066 | $81,168 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”