Farm Subsidy information
Dane County, Wisconsin
Total Subsidies in Dane County, Wisconsin, 2020
Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 1,738
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in Dane County, Wisconsin totaled $70,962,000 in in 2020.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 2020 |
---|---|---|---|
21 | Stanley Rauls | De Forest, WI 53532 | $555,461 |
22 | Virgil A Ripp | Dane, WI 53529 | $553,228 |
23 | Sweetwater Farms Inc | Dane, WI 53529 | $549,334 |
24 | Waddell Farms LLC | Marshall, WI 53559 | $542,169 |
25 | Maunesha River Dairy LLC | Sun Prairie, WI 53590 | $508,365 |
26 | Dane County Growers Ptrn | Edgerton, WI 53534 | $494,418 |
27 | Philip M Richards | Cross Plains, WI 53528 | $483,628 |
28 | Mystic Valley Dairy LLC | Sauk City, WI 53583 | $474,720 |
29 | Brian K Rademacher | Cottage Grove, WI 53527 | $471,999 |
30 | Jay A Rauls | Deforest, WI 53532 | $434,086 |
31 | Jeremy M Hoffman | Waunakee, WI 53597 | $433,105 |
32 | Wilkes LLC | Waterloo, WI 53594 | $406,142 |
33 | Gobel Dairy LLC | Belleville, WI 53508 | $391,718 |
34 | Roger S Manthe | Deforest, WI 53532 | $386,676 |
35 | Dohm Farms LLC | Dane, WI 53529 | $384,595 |
36 | Laufenberg Farms Waunakee LLC | Waunakee, WI 53597 | $375,141 |
37 | Sponem Valley View Dairy LLC | Mount Horeb, WI 53572 | $367,892 |
38 | Agrifund LLC ** | Amarillo, TX 79106 | $362,661 |
39 | Mark J Rauls | Deforest, WI 53532 | $358,824 |
40 | Ripp's Wauna-dairy Inc | Waunakee, WI 53597 | $356,803 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”