Conservation Reserve Program in Dane County, Wisconsin, 1995-2023

Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 2,608

Recipients of Conservation Reserve Program from farms in Dane County, Wisconsin totaled $68,022,000 in from 1995-2023.

Rank Recipient
(* ownership information available)
Location Conservation Reserve Program
1995-2023
21Thomas G TeschBlanchardville, WI 53516$249,796
22Richard KellyMcfarland, WI 53558$243,952
23Gary R ZieglerMazomanie, WI 53560$243,225
24Daniel R WitteBlack Earth, WI 53515$240,518
25Katharine G GansnerMount Horeb, WI 53572$230,733
26The Dennis D & Susan E Orr Jt Rev TrBlanchardville, WI 53516$228,362
27Schmitt BrosVerona, WI 53593$225,993
28Gary F ZwettlerBlue Mounds, WI 53517$222,667
29Frederick R MergDeerfield, WI 53531$221,314
30Ok Enterprises LLC C/0 Brian OuthouseMount Horeb, WI 53572$220,234
31Harlan OlsonMount Horeb, WI 53572$217,158
32Verdean L ShervenMonticello, WI 53570$212,002
33Mdw Investments LLCBlack Earth, WI 53515$204,793
34William O SmithBlanchardville, WI 53516$203,906
35Duane A WagnerMadison, WI 53711$201,263
36David T LathropMcfarland, WI 53558$201,255
37Katz Wi Farm Trust PartnershipSycamore, IL 60178$199,653
38Gary AeblyVerona, WI 53593$195,060
39Swamplovers Foundation IncCross Plains, WI 53528$194,959
40Richard L Keller Living TrustMount Horeb, WI 53572$194,217

* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.

** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”

<< Previous | Next >>

 

Farm Subsidies Education

AgMag