Market Gains in Dane County, Wisconsin, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 218
Recipients of Market Gains from farms in Dane County, Wisconsin totaled $4,179,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Market Gains 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
21 | Klein Trust | Oregon, WI 53575 | $54,485 |
22 | Village View Farms | Brooklyn, WI 53521 | $53,649 |
23 | Eugene C Henning | Marshall, WI 53559 | $51,530 |
24 | Kaltenberg Seed Farms Inc | Waunakee, WI 53597 | $47,516 |
25 | Batz Seed Farm Inc | Sun Prairie, WI 53590 | $45,036 |
26 | Lonny Hahn | De Forest, WI 53532 | $40,168 |
27 | Paul Helt | Dane, WI 53529 | $40,168 |
28 | Doerfer Brothers Inc | Verona, WI 53593 | $38,589 |
29 | D & D Olson Farms Inc | Stoughton, WI 53589 | $37,584 |
30 | Blue Star Dairy Farms Partnership | De Forest, WI 53532 | $36,348 |
31 | Myron Fosdal | Stoughton, WI 53589 | $34,499 |
32 | Thomas N Helt | Waunakee, WI 53597 | $33,423 |
33 | James E Lund | Deerfield, WI 53531 | $33,347 |
34 | Dustin D Kelley | Arlington, WI 53911 | $33,039 |
35 | Scott Mickelson | Cambridge, WI 53523 | $32,163 |
36 | John Thomas Kalscheur | Cross Plains, WI 53528 | $31,988 |
37 | Patricia Fosdal | Stoughton, WI 53589 | $31,199 |
38 | Julia C Hoffman | Columbus, WI 53925 | $30,435 |
39 | Gregory Ziegler | Middleton, WI 53562 | $30,059 |
40 | Dennis J Lund | Cambridge, WI 53523 | $29,159 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”