Total Conservation Programs in Dodge County, Wisconsin, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 1,184
Recipients of Total Conservation Programs from farms in Dodge County, Wisconsin totaled $24,605,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Conservation Programs 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
21 | John Paul Mesching | Nashotah, WI 53058 | $133,358 |
22 | Clark Acres Inc | Mayville, WI 53050 | $133,102 |
23 | Raymond D Parpart | Columbus, WI 53925 | $131,222 |
24 | Thieme Farms Inc | Verona, WI 53593 | $130,825 |
25 | Herbert Bolz | Watertown, WI 53098 | $129,422 |
26 | Helmut Baltruweit | Reeseville, WI 53579 | $125,490 |
27 | Dennis Fleischer II | Theresa, WI 53091 | $125,468 |
28 | Juneau Rod&gun Club Inc | Juneau, WI 53039 | $122,896 |
29 | Jeffrey M Bahls | Beaver Dam, WI 53916 | $120,681 |
30 | Roy W Reabe | Waupun, WI 53963 | $120,546 |
31 | Elvin E Will | Hustisford, WI 53034 | $120,160 |
32 | Springbrook Hills Farm LLC | Iron Ridge, WI 53035 | $116,960 |
33 | R & P Bodden Family LLC | Kewaskum, WI 53040 | $116,084 |
34 | Joseph/marie Roche | Columbus, WI 53925 | $113,404 |
35 | Field&stream Sports Club-horicon | Mayville, WI 53050 | $111,989 |
36 | Daniel J Klink | Iron Ridge, WI 53035 | $110,833 |
37 | Harvey Smit | Mayville, WI 53050 | $110,408 |
38 | Mary Colleen Margaret Ward | Juneau, WI 53039 | $110,200 |
39 | Biljean Farms Inc | Watertown, WI 53098 | $109,733 |
40 | Tom Gallmann | Watertown, WI 53098 | $109,378 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”