Total Commodity Programs in Dodge County, Wisconsin, 2021
Subsidy Recipients 101 to 120 of 861
Recipients of Total Commodity Programs from farms in Dodge County, Wisconsin totaled $14,619,000 in in 2021.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Commodity Programs 2021 |
---|---|---|---|
101 | Batterman Farms Of Mayville LLC | Mayville, WI 53050 | $38,504 |
102 | Robert W Haase | Beaver Dam, WI 53916 | $38,303 |
103 | Louis Nehls Farms Inc | Juneau, WI 53039 | $37,554 |
104 | Country Gate Farm Inc | Reeseville, WI 53579 | $37,138 |
105 | Rexdale Inc | Iron Ridge, WI 53035 | $36,327 |
106 | David F Schliewe | Watertown, WI 53098 | $36,277 |
107 | Steven K Schmidt | Waupun, WI 53963 | $36,014 |
108 | Steve K Perry | Fox Lake, WI 53933 | $35,834 |
109 | Gary D Zimmerman | Burnett, WI 53922 | $35,715 |
110 | Daniel J Zimmerman | Fox Lake, WI 53933 | $34,766 |
111 | Lvj Farms Inc | Reeseville, WI 53579 | $34,746 |
112 | James E Christ | Rubicon, WI 53078 | $34,285 |
113 | Krenz Farms LLC | Beaver Dam, WI 53916 | $33,591 |
114 | Dale E Twardokus | Mayville, WI 53050 | $33,472 |
115 | Schmidt Family Farm LLC | Juneau, WI 53039 | $33,210 |
116 | Frederick - Gay Living Trust John Gay | Reeseville, WI 53579 | $32,982 |
117 | Randal R Woltman | Juneau, WI 53039 | $32,872 |
118 | Vz Farm LLC | Beaver Dam, WI 53916 | $32,610 |
119 | Robert G Fiedler Jr | Watertown, WI 53098 | $31,730 |
120 | Calvin Geertsma | Randolph, WI 53956 | $31,340 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”