Agricultural Risk Coverage (ARC) Program in Door County, Wisconsin, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 61 to 80 of 292
Recipients of Agricultural Risk Coverage (ARC) Program from farms in Door County, Wisconsin totaled $2,048,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Agricultural Risk Coverage (ARC) Program 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
61 | Bruce K Hawkey | Sturgeon Bay, WI 54235 | $10,063 |
62 | William R De Grave | Casco, WI 54205 | $9,940 |
63 | Galen J Baudhuin | Brussels, WI 54204 | $9,366 |
64 | Charles E Stoeger | Sturgeon Bay, WI 54235 | $9,359 |
65 | Kerry J Denil | Brussels, WI 54204 | $9,093 |
66 | Gary Grunwald | Sturgeon Bay, WI 54235 | $8,729 |
67 | Sullys Produce LLC | Sturgeon Bay, WI 54235 | $8,661 |
68 | Maple Tree Dairy LLC | Egg Harbor, WI 54209 | $8,555 |
69 | Brey Cycle Farm LLC | Sturgeon Bay, WI 54235 | $8,277 |
70 | Lazy J Dairy Farms LLC | Luxemburg, WI 54217 | $8,190 |
71 | Gregg A Viste | Sturgeon Bay, WI 54235 | $8,114 |
72 | Donald C Rudolph | Sturgeon Bay, WI 54235 | $7,767 |
73 | L George Evenson | Sturgeon Bay, WI 54235 | $7,738 |
74 | Charles Carmody | Sturgeon Bay, WI 54235 | $7,577 |
75 | Charles E Forsch | Sturgeon Bay, WI 54235 | $7,506 |
76 | Daniel Hasenjager | Sturgeon Bay, WI 54235 | $7,481 |
77 | Loren K Uecker | Forestville, WI 54213 | $7,119 |
78 | Church Site Farms Partnership | Brussels, WI 54204 | $6,895 |
79 | Robert E Columb | Sturgeon Bay, WI 54235 | $6,731 |
80 | David J Baudhuin | Sturgeon Bay, WI 54235 | $6,695 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”