Loan Deficiency in Dunn County, Wisconsin, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 41 to 60 of 908
Recipients of Loan Deficiency from farms in Dunn County, Wisconsin totaled $14,760,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Loan Deficiency 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
41 | David Wayne Dummer | Elk Mound, WI 54739 | $66,909 |
42 | Lawrence W Drier | Eau Galle, WI 54737 | $62,290 |
43 | Louis B Styer | Colfax, WI 54730 | $61,951 |
44 | William A Beyrer | Colfax, WI 54730 | $61,873 |
45 | Quilling Farms LLC | Menomonie, WI 54751 | $61,495 |
46 | Pinehurst Farms Ltd | Boyceville, WI 54725 | $61,468 |
47 | Wyss-consin Farms Llp | Boyceville, WI 54725 | $61,130 |
48 | David Pechmiller | Menomonie, WI 54751 | $61,040 |
49 | Val-o-mo Farm Inc | Elmwood, WI 54740 | $58,755 |
50 | Marshall Quilling Partnership | Menomonie, WI 54751 | $58,463 |
51 | Roger Cummings | Menomonie, WI 54751 | $57,194 |
52 | Lila Bates | Elmwood, WI 54740 | $56,924 |
53 | James A Holte | Elk Mound, WI 54739 | $56,874 |
54 | Seipel Farms Gary & Lorin | Eau Galle, WI 54737 | $56,584 |
55 | Martin C Mellenthin | Eau Galle, WI 54737 | $56,142 |
56 | Richard J Miller | Menomonie, WI 54751 | $56,060 |
57 | Virginia Grohn | Elk Mound, WI 54739 | $54,818 |
58 | Dale Albricht | Colfax, WI 54730 | $54,747 |
59 | Doane Ltd | Menomonie, WI 54751 | $52,866 |
60 | Myers Farm | Elk Mound, WI 54739 | $51,702 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”