Farm Subsidy information
Dunn County, Wisconsin
Total Subsidies in Dunn County, Wisconsin, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 3,615
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in Dunn County, Wisconsin totaled $294,605,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
1 | Alfa Lawn Farms LLC | Menomonie, WI 54751 | $3,759,829 |
2 | Ron Prochnow | Menomonie, WI 54751 | $2,183,063 |
3 | Henry Thomas | Menomonie, WI 54751 | $2,131,290 |
4 | Luanne M Prochnow | Menomonie, WI 54751 | $2,130,125 |
5 | Denmark Dairy LLC | Colfax, WI 54730 | $2,082,885 |
6 | Thomas D Kopp | Elk Mound, WI 54739 | $1,958,926 |
7 | Baier Creek Farms Inc | Elmwood, WI 54740 | $1,744,000 |
8 | John C Higbie Jr | Colfax, WI 54730 | $1,721,975 |
9 | Doane Ltd | Menomonie, WI 54751 | $1,676,284 |
10 | Beskar Partners | Wheeler, WI 54772 | $1,651,631 |
11 | C Dairy LLC | Greenwood, WI 54437 | $1,464,968 |
12 | Quarry Heights Farms Ltd | Elmwood, WI 54740 | $1,460,670 |
13 | Val-o-mo Farm Inc | Elmwood, WI 54740 | $1,393,763 |
14 | William Harold Beskar | Menomonie, WI 54751 | $1,354,139 |
15 | Robert Brendsel | Elk Mound, WI 54739 | $1,353,500 |
16 | Ronald G Weisenbeck | Eau Galle, WI 54737 | $1,334,255 |
17 | Jaquish Farms Inc | Eau Claire, WI 54701 | $1,333,323 |
18 | Red Pine Farms | Menomonie, WI 54751 | $1,287,032 |
19 | Pauline Marilyn Beskar | Menomonie, WI 54751 | $1,268,774 |
20 | Michael S Nelson | New Auburn, WI 54757 | $1,237,487 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>