Farm Subsidy information
Eau Claire County, Wisconsin
Total Subsidies in Eau Claire County, Wisconsin, 2023
Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 301
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in Eau Claire County, Wisconsin totaled $6,234,000 in in 2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 2023 |
---|---|---|---|
21 | Darin Noel | Fall Creek, WI 54742 | $30,365 |
22 | Karow Farms | Augusta, WI 54722 | $29,754 |
23 | Wayne Nelson | Fall Creek, WI 54742 | $28,622 |
24 | Ricky K Strauch | Fairchild, WI 54741 | $28,592 |
25 | David Messerschmidt | Fall Creek, WI 54742 | $27,548 |
26 | Matthew D Krenz | Fall Creek, WI 54742 | $27,078 |
27 | Allison Bredlau | Augusta, WI 54722 | $26,071 |
28 | Daniel R Boettcher | Fairchild, WI 54741 | $25,817 |
29 | Scott Bischoff | Eau Claire, WI 54701 | $24,415 |
30 | , | $22,422 | |
31 | Mark Goings | Augusta, WI 54722 | $22,121 |
32 | Gregory Stanek | Augusta, WI 54722 | $22,116 |
33 | Robert Norman | Bristol, WI 53104 | $20,425 |
34 | Phillip T Statz | Chippewa Falls, WI 54729 | $19,525 |
35 | Ronald Steinke | Fall Creek, WI 54742 | $19,297 |
36 | Larry Myhre | Augusta, WI 54722 | $19,254 |
37 | , | $17,188 | |
38 | Woodpecker's Paradise LLC | Strum, WI 54770 | $16,364 |
39 | John Pettis | Augusta, WI 54722 | $16,131 |
40 | Sarah Schaffer | Eau Claire, WI 54701 | $14,351 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”