Total Commodity Programs in Eau Claire County, Wisconsin, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 81 to 100 of 1,915
Recipients of Total Commodity Programs from farms in Eau Claire County, Wisconsin totaled $71,143,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Commodity Programs 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
81 | Peter J Gregor | Augusta, WI 54722 | $226,355 |
82 | Bryon Berger | Strum, WI 54770 | $212,878 |
83 | Daniel J Lindeman | Osseo, WI 54758 | $206,495 |
84 | Schafferland Farms Inc | Eau Claire, WI 54701 | $203,526 |
85 | Larry Wathke | Fall Creek, WI 54742 | $202,451 |
86 | Norman A Bryce Estate | Eau Claire, WI 54701 | $201,858 |
87 | Maybe Farms | Eau Claire, WI 54703 | $201,568 |
88 | Diane R Haigh | Eleva, WI 54738 | $194,568 |
89 | Wathke Farms | Fall Creek, WI 54742 | $188,464 |
90 | Michael A Bauer Sr | Eleva, WI 54738 | $185,939 |
91 | Dean Zimmerman | Fall Creek, WI 54742 | $184,816 |
92 | Charles A Scott | Eau Claire, WI 54701 | $184,509 |
93 | Perry Farms Inactive | Osseo, WI 54758 | $184,349 |
94 | Donald Schroeder | Augusta, WI 54722 | $184,102 |
95 | Fredric W & Janice L Back Rev Living Trust | Strum, WI 54770 | $183,963 |
96 | Bruce Krenz | Augusta, WI 54722 | $182,254 |
97 | Hart Farms | Strum, WI 54770 | $179,002 |
98 | Dean A Karow | Augusta, WI 54722 | $178,913 |
99 | Mueller Hilltop Farms Inc | Fall Creek, WI 54742 | $175,959 |
100 | James Jackson | Chippewa Falls, WI 54729 | $175,627 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”