Loan Deficiency in Eau Claire County, Wisconsin, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 101 to 120 of 540
Recipients of Loan Deficiency from farms in Eau Claire County, Wisconsin totaled $6,916,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Loan Deficiency 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
101 | Daniel Von Haden | Fall Creek, WI 54742 | $19,382 |
102 | Dennis Volbrecht | Fall Creek, WI 54742 | $19,314 |
103 | Charles A Scott | Eau Claire, WI 54701 | $19,048 |
104 | William Trescher | Augusta, WI 54722 | $18,910 |
105 | James Hampton | Augusta, WI 54722 | $18,859 |
106 | Bruce Krenz | Augusta, WI 54722 | $18,808 |
107 | Ricky K Strauch | Fairchild, WI 54741 | $18,732 |
108 | Dean Zimmerman | Fall Creek, WI 54742 | $18,089 |
109 | Robert Schmidt | Strum, WI 54770 | $17,993 |
110 | Luke Popp | Chilton, WI 53014 | $17,922 |
111 | Paul Messerschmidt | Fall Creek, WI 54742 | $17,628 |
112 | Richard Cleasby | Eau Claire, WI 54701 | $17,609 |
113 | Eldoto Farms | Fall Creek, WI 54742 | $17,468 |
114 | Joseph P Matz | Strum, WI 54770 | $17,211 |
115 | Drinkman Dairy Inc | Eau Claire, WI 54701 | $17,179 |
116 | Gerald Schiefelbein | Fall Creek, WI 54742 | $17,108 |
117 | Gary Menard | Eau Claire, WI 54703 | $17,040 |
118 | Richard A Kinderman | Barnes, WI 54873 | $16,685 |
119 | James Buse Sr | Augusta, WI 54722 | $16,539 |
120 | Wilbert Schaffer | Cannon Falls, MN 55009 | $16,490 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”