Farm Subsidy information
Eau Claire County, Wisconsin
Total Subsidies in Eau Claire County, Wisconsin, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 2,486
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in Eau Claire County, Wisconsin totaled $140,197,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
1 | Huntsinger Farms Inc | Eau Claire, WI 54701 | $1,776,993 |
2 | Fischer Brothers | Fairchild, WI 54741 | $1,707,680 |
3 | Seguin's Valley View Acres LLC | Eleva, WI 54738 | $1,435,506 |
4 | Zimmerman Farms | Osseo, WI 54758 | $1,353,126 |
5 | Kurt Schulz | Augusta, WI 54722 | $1,272,904 |
6 | Charles Huth | Boyd, WI 54726 | $1,120,057 |
7 | Bears Grass Dairy Inc | Augusta, WI 54722 | $1,042,752 |
8 | Larson Dairy Inc | Eleva, WI 54738 | $1,015,296 |
9 | Walker Bros Farm Dba Skyglo Farms | Augusta, WI 54722 | $936,557 |
10 | Gabler Farms | Augusta, WI 54722 | $918,369 |
11 | Patrick Schaffer | Eau Claire, WI 54701 | $851,116 |
12 | Todd T Stanek | Fall Creek, WI 54742 | $766,332 |
13 | Donald L Brott | Eau Claire, WI 54701 | $758,401 |
14 | Gary Erickson | Eau Claire, WI 54701 | $690,677 |
15 | O Bruce Bernard | Eau Claire, WI 54703 | $675,530 |
16 | Donald Pieper | Fall Creek, WI 54742 | $651,545 |
17 | Wilbert Schaffer | Cannon Falls, MN 55009 | $636,354 |
18 | James Stensen | Augusta, WI 54722 | $605,782 |
19 | Sarah Schaffer | Eau Claire, WI 54701 | $573,816 |
20 | Gary Roberts | Fall Creek, WI 54742 | $565,717 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>