Conservation Reserve Program in Fond Du Lac County, Wisconsin, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 1,159
Recipients of Conservation Reserve Program from farms in Fond Du Lac County, Wisconsin totaled $24,065,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Conservation Reserve Program 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
21 | Faith E Mitchell | Van Dyne, WI 54979 | $115,826 |
22 | Alex Zabel | Brandon, WI 53919 | $110,121 |
23 | Joel S Streblow | Fond Du Lac, WI 54937 | $104,459 |
24 | Katherine Davies | Eldorado, WI 54932 | $104,286 |
25 | Stuart Muche | Van Dyne, WI 54979 | $104,116 |
26 | Fred Williams | Oakfield, WI 53065 | $103,043 |
27 | Stephen A Olm | Ripon, WI 54971 | $100,910 |
28 | Stobb Fam Irrv Tr | Green Lake, WI 54941 | $100,731 |
29 | David Brenner | Eldorado, WI 54932 | $99,232 |
30 | James H Schmitz | Oakfield, WI 53065 | $98,805 |
31 | Leo C Mueller | Campbellsport, WI 53010 | $97,674 |
32 | Ronald A Goldapske | Van Dyne, WI 54979 | $96,162 |
33 | Wings Over Wisconsin Inc | Mayville, WI 53050 | $96,101 |
34 | Mand Trust | Mount Calvary, WI 53057 | $94,925 |
35 | Cyril Simon | Fond Du Lac, WI 54935 | $94,672 |
36 | Elmer O Wohler | Eldorado, WI 54932 | $94,032 |
37 | Mary Wirth Revocable Living Trust | Fond Du Lac, WI 54935 | $93,634 |
38 | Donley Henning | Fort Atkinson, WI 53538 | $92,467 |
39 | River Hills Farms Inc | Lakeville, MN 55044 | $91,885 |
40 | Steenberg & Huettl Inv | Fond Du Lac, WI 54936 | $91,795 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”