Conservation Reserve Program in Fond Du Lac County, Wisconsin, 2021
Subsidy Recipients 141 to 160 of 184
Recipients of Conservation Reserve Program from farms in Fond Du Lac County, Wisconsin totaled $389,000 in in 2021.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Conservation Reserve Program 2021 |
---|---|---|---|
141 | Anthony H & Loretta B Koenigs Living Trust | Fond Du Lac, WI 54937 | $632 |
142 | Roger D Jaber | Fond Du Lac, WI 54935 | $630 |
143 | Bruce Jaber | Fond Du Lac, WI 54937 | $630 |
144 | Ralph Jaber | Fond Du Lac, WI 54935 | $630 |
145 | Barbara Develice | Fond Du Lac, WI 54937 | $630 |
146 | George Hettenhaus | West Bend, WI 53090 | $630 |
147 | Jeffrey M Champeau | Oakfield, WI 53065 | $626 |
148 | James Tiefenthaler Jr | Boulder Junction, WI 54512 | $623 |
149 | Wayne Beattie | Appleton, WI 54915 | $623 |
150 | Daniel M Beattie | Pickett, WI 54964 | $623 |
151 | Mary K Beattie | Neenah, WI 54956 | $623 |
152 | Keven P Beattie Trust Shares | Appleton, WI 54915 | $621 |
153 | Stephen Kramer | Fond Du Lac, WI 54937 | $578 |
154 | Robert Kolb | Sheboygan Falls, WI 53085 | $552 |
155 | Mark G Diederichs | Malone, WI 53049 | $549 |
156 | David J Soeller | Ripon, WI 54971 | $547 |
157 | Jonathan E Scheuers | Brandon, WI 53919 | $534 |
158 | Thomas E Hintz | Eden, WI 53019 | $486 |
159 | Andrew Neumann | Mount Calvary, WI 53057 | $481 |
160 | Ronald Patt | Oshkosh, WI 54904 | $451 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”