Total Commodity Programs in Fond Du Lac County, Wisconsin, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 141 to 160 of 2,800
Recipients of Total Commodity Programs from farms in Fond Du Lac County, Wisconsin totaled $258,183,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Commodity Programs 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
141 | Harold L King | Brownsville, WI 53006 | $452,861 |
142 | Dean J Coehoorn | Rosendale, WI 54974 | $449,718 |
143 | Francis Giebel | Eldorado, WI 54932 | $442,482 |
144 | Senland Farms LLC | Campbellsport, WI 53010 | $441,555 |
145 | Tom N Badtke | Oshkosh, WI 54904 | $439,674 |
146 | Charles D Kraft | Fond Du Lac, WI 54937 | $438,481 |
147 | S & S Dairy Farm LLC | New Holstein, WI 53061 | $434,971 |
148 | King Farms Grain Company LLC | Brownsville, WI 53006 | $434,436 |
149 | J P Grahl Farms Inc | Eden, WI 53019 | $433,779 |
150 | Louis W Averbeck | Fond Du Lac, WI 54937 | $433,752 |
151 | John Pollack | Van Dyne, WI 54979 | $432,354 |
152 | Wilbur Whitby | Malone, WI 53049 | $428,637 |
153 | Daniel Diederichs | Fond Du Lac, WI 54937 | $427,690 |
154 | Timothy J Murphy | Eden, WI 53019 | $426,979 |
155 | Melvin E Gunnink | Brandon, WI 53919 | $425,645 |
156 | Spirit Enterprise Inc | Fond Du Lac, WI 54936 | $421,875 |
157 | Bengel Hillside Dairy LLC | Campbellsport, WI 53010 | $411,856 |
158 | Adam D Averbeck | Oshkosh, WI 54902 | $408,450 |
159 | Boelk Bros | Oakfield, WI 53065 | $403,495 |
160 | Schmuhl Farms Inc | Brandon, WI 53919 | $400,537 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”