Farm Subsidy information
Fond Du Lac County, Wisconsin
Total Subsidies in Fond Du Lac County, Wisconsin, 2019
Subsidy Recipients 41 to 60 of 873
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in Fond Du Lac County, Wisconsin totaled $16,570,000 in in 2019.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 2019 |
---|---|---|---|
41 | Pollack Dairy LLC | Van Dyne, WI 54979 | $66,738 |
42 | Dinnerbell Farms LLC | Eden, WI 53019 | $64,619 |
43 | Julie A Shafer | Oakfield, WI 53065 | $63,288 |
44 | Bartz Farms LLC | Pickett, WI 54964 | $63,097 |
45 | Rgmf Stock LLC | Oakfield, WI 53065 | $62,343 |
46 | Joseph E Uttendorfer | Oakfield, WI 53065 | $60,966 |
47 | Dennis Pipping | Fond Du Lac, WI 54935 | $59,884 |
48 | Second Look Holsteins LLC | Eden, WI 53019 | $59,832 |
49 | Jeff Miller | Pickett, WI 54964 | $59,713 |
50 | Grow Pro LLC | Rosendale, WI 54974 | $58,992 |
51 | Brian A & Janice Badtke Living Trust | Ripon, WI 54971 | $56,423 |
52 | Earl & Yvonne Sippel Rev Trust | Saint Cloud, WI 53079 | $56,209 |
53 | A & L Lisowe & Sons Inc | Chilton, WI 53014 | $55,411 |
54 | Ronald J Felten | Saint Cloud, WI 53079 | $55,108 |
55 | King Farms Grain Company LLC | Brownsville, WI 53006 | $54,948 |
56 | Piney Lawn Acres LLC | Fond Du Lac, WI 54937 | $54,857 |
57 | Hiemstra Dairy LLC | Brandon, WI 53919 | $54,655 |
58 | Schultz Family Farms Llp | Eden, WI 53019 | $54,496 |
59 | Hillside Dairy LLC | Mount Calvary, WI 53057 | $53,929 |
60 | Liner Dairy LLC | Van Dyne, WI 54979 | $53,804 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”