Price Loss Coverage Program (PLC) in Fond Du Lac County, Wisconsin, 2019
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 147
Recipients of Price Loss Coverage Program (PLC) from farms in Fond Du Lac County, Wisconsin totaled $70,006 in in 2019.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Price Loss Coverage Program (PLC) 2019 |
---|---|---|---|
1 | Boelk Bros Llp | Oakfield, WI 53065 | $4,653 |
2 | Christopher D Retzlaff | Ripon, WI 54971 | $3,940 |
3 | Piney Lawn Acres LLC | Fond Du Lac, WI 54937 | $2,392 |
4 | Michael C & Kathleen L Weber Revocable Living Trus | Chilton, WI 53014 | $2,147 |
5 | Jerome C Schwartz | Lomira, WI 53048 | $2,127 |
6 | Vir-clar Farms LLC | Fond Du Lac, WI 54937 | $1,800 |
7 | Joseph S Mccourt | Fond Du Lac, WI 54937 | $1,499 |
8 | Dennis Pinch | Rosendale, WI 54974 | $1,478 |
9 | Jeffrey G Pinch | Rosendale, WI 54974 | $1,478 |
10 | Matthew A Joas | Oakfield, WI 53065 | $1,436 |
11 | David E Weber | New Holstein, WI 53061 | $1,427 |
12 | Jeffrey R Donovan | Bloomington, IL 61705 | $1,375 |
13 | James M Fox | Fond Du Lac, WI 54937 | $1,261 |
14 | Wayne F Hansen | Van Dyne, WI 54979 | $1,247 |
15 | Olden Produce LLC | Ripon, WI 54971 | $1,240 |
16 | Robert Hettwer | Fond Du Lac, WI 54937 | $1,189 |
17 | Farm Services Agency ** | Washington, DC 20250 | $1,171 |
18 | Joan Hielke | Pickett, WI 54964 | $1,086 |
19 | Dennis Hielke | Ripon, WI 54971 | $1,048 |
20 | Stephen & Leo A Goebel Ptr | Fond Du Lac, WI 54937 | $1,003 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>