Total Conservation Programs in Fond Du Lac County, Wisconsin, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 41 to 60 of 1,205
Recipients of Total Conservation Programs from farms in Fond Du Lac County, Wisconsin totaled $24,248,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Conservation Programs 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
41 | Stanley Ruplinger | Oakfield, WI 53065 | $91,495 |
42 | James P Kelly Jr | Fond Du Lac, WI 54937 | $91,336 |
43 | Eugene Deboer | Brandon, WI 53919 | $89,473 |
44 | Gregory A Stratz | Fond Du Lac, WI 54937 | $88,866 |
45 | David A. & Sharon E. Burbach Revocable Living Tru | Oakfield, WI 53065 | $88,612 |
46 | Sippel Revocable Trust | Mount Calvary, WI 53057 | $87,972 |
47 | Steven A Schumacher | Goshen, IN 46528 | $87,375 |
48 | James Pfeiffer | Waupun, WI 53963 | $86,817 |
49 | William Mcclarran | Campbellsport, WI 53010 | $86,531 |
50 | Clayton Georgeson | Oshkosh, WI 54902 | $85,031 |
51 | Darrel Bebow Family Trust | Fond Du Lac, WI 54935 | $83,800 |
52 | Harold H Pickart | Saint Cloud, WI 53079 | $83,755 |
53 | Gerald J Konen | Fond Du Lac, WI 54937 | $83,541 |
54 | Wallace Corporation | Fond Du Lac, WI 54937 | $82,771 |
55 | Steven C Wilke | Eden, WI 53019 | $81,297 |
56 | Forest Springs Farm Llp | Fond Du Lac, WI 54937 | $81,151 |
57 | Calvary Cemetery | Fond Du Lac, WI 54935 | $80,150 |
58 | Thome Farm Partnership | Fond Du Lac, WI 54935 | $78,501 |
59 | Neil Sonnenberg | Fond Du Lac, WI 54937 | $78,383 |
60 | James H Meyer | Brandon, WI 53919 | $75,764 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”