Total Conservation Programs in Fond Du Lac County, Wisconsin, 1995-2023

Subsidy Recipients 41 to 60 of 1,205

Recipients of Total Conservation Programs from farms in Fond Du Lac County, Wisconsin totaled $24,248,000 in from 1995-2023.

Rank Recipient
(* ownership information available)
Location Total Conservation Programs
1995-2023
41Stanley RuplingerOakfield, WI 53065$91,495
42James P Kelly JrFond Du Lac, WI 54937$91,336
43Eugene DeboerBrandon, WI 53919$89,473
44Gregory A StratzFond Du Lac, WI 54937$88,866
45David A. & Sharon E. Burbach Revocable Living TruOakfield, WI 53065$88,612
46Sippel Revocable TrustMount Calvary, WI 53057$87,972
47Steven A SchumacherGoshen, IN 46528$87,375
48James PfeifferWaupun, WI 53963$86,817
49William McclarranCampbellsport, WI 53010$86,531
50Clayton GeorgesonOshkosh, WI 54902$85,031
51Darrel Bebow Family TrustFond Du Lac, WI 54935$83,800
52Harold H PickartSaint Cloud, WI 53079$83,755
53Gerald J KonenFond Du Lac, WI 54937$83,541
54Wallace CorporationFond Du Lac, WI 54937$82,771
55Steven C WilkeEden, WI 53019$81,297
56Forest Springs Farm LlpFond Du Lac, WI 54937$81,151
57Calvary CemeteryFond Du Lac, WI 54935$80,150
58Thome Farm PartnershipFond Du Lac, WI 54935$78,501
59Neil SonnenbergFond Du Lac, WI 54937$78,383
60James H MeyerBrandon, WI 53919$75,764

* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.

** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”

<< Previous | Next >>

 

Farm Subsidies Education

AgMag