Conservation Reserve Program in Grant County, Wisconsin, 2021
Subsidy Recipients 81 to 100 of 683
Recipients of Conservation Reserve Program from farms in Grant County, Wisconsin totaled $5,708,000 in in 2021.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Conservation Reserve Program 2021 |
---|---|---|---|
81 | Thomas A Reynolds | Potosi, WI 53820 | $19,800 |
82 | Haines Farm LLC | Lancaster, WI 53813 | $19,696 |
83 | Hurricane Hills LLC | Chanhassen, MN 55317 | $19,532 |
84 | John A Slack | Livingston, WI 53554 | $19,276 |
85 | Haas Heritage Farm LLC | Hazel Green, WI 53811 | $19,250 |
86 | Double T & D Grain Inc | Platteville, WI 53818 | $19,174 |
87 | Mark J Dietzel | Cuba City, WI 53807 | $19,133 |
88 | Pamela Labarge | Platteville, WI 53818 | $18,855 |
89 | Dale & Mary Grace Leibfried Irrev Trust | Platteville, WI 53818 | $18,380 |
90 | Leonard Lee Neises | Mount Hope, WI 53816 | $18,216 |
91 | Kathleen Neises | Mount Hope, WI 53816 | $18,216 |
92 | James R Schlaugat | Mount Hope, WI 53816 | $17,892 |
93 | Russell D Wachter | Mount Hope, WI 53816 | $17,532 |
94 | Bertram Trust Dated February 22, 2008 | Platteville, WI 53818 | $17,515 |
95 | Doug D Steinback | Platteville, WI 53818 | $17,464 |
96 | Gunnar Renner | Prairie Du Chien, WI 53821 | $17,449 |
97 | Thomas L Ralston | Muskego, WI 53150 | $17,372 |
98 | Stastny Family Wood Bank Farm LLC | Fennimore, WI 53809 | $16,928 |
99 | Ronald Sturdevant | Muscoda, WI 53573 | $16,601 |
100 | Mark Loy | Livingston, WI 53554 | $16,566 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”