Dairy Programs in Grant County, Wisconsin, 2021
Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 224
Recipients of Dairy Programs from farms in Grant County, Wisconsin totaled $10,434,000 in in 2021.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Dairy Programs 2021 |
---|---|---|---|
21 | Landon Farms Inc | Lancaster, WI 53813 | $117,108 |
22 | S And S Rocky Ridge Farms LLC | Lancaster, WI 53813 | $113,619 |
23 | North Side Genetics LLC | Fennimore, WI 53809 | $113,008 |
24 | J & M Farm | Hazel Green, WI 53811 | $113,008 |
25 | Banner Ridge Farms LLC | Platteville, WI 53818 | $113,008 |
26 | Al-do Farms Inc | Lancaster, WI 53813 | $113,008 |
27 | Thomas C Weigel | Platteville, WI 53818 | $113,008 |
28 | Ridge View Dairy LLC | Mount Hope, WI 53816 | $113,008 |
29 | Paul R Oberholtzer | Bloomington, WI 53804 | $108,288 |
30 | Vosberg Colonial Acres LLC | Cuba City, WI 53807 | $106,172 |
31 | Nathan A Landon | Lancaster, WI 53813 | $101,809 |
32 | Menke's Swiss Farm LLC | Highland, WI 53543 | $99,771 |
33 | James K Lepeska | Stitzer, WI 53825 | $95,841 |
34 | Leibfried Dairy Farms Llp | Hazel Green, WI 53811 | $95,336 |
35 | Mul-vue Farm Limited Partnership | Mount Hope, WI 53816 | $95,219 |
36 | Mjj Farm LLC | Montfort, WI 53569 | $94,605 |
37 | Paradise-d Holsteins LLC | Lancaster, WI 53813 | $93,671 |
38 | Scanlan Brothers LLC | Fennimore, WI 53809 | $89,163 |
39 | Nobland Farms LLC | Lancaster, WI 53813 | $88,905 |
40 | Martin R Tashner | Cuba City, WI 53807 | $85,510 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”