Farm Subsidy information
Jackson County, Wisconsin
Total Subsidies in Jackson County, Wisconsin, 2022
Subsidy Recipients 81 to 100 of 265
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in Jackson County, Wisconsin totaled $6,329,000 in in 2022.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 2022 |
---|---|---|---|
81 | David G And Marsha L Nelson Revocable Trust | Melrose, WI 54642 | $6,289 |
82 | John S Rao | Ettrick, WI 54627 | $6,249 |
83 | Daryl Winter | Fall River, WI 53932 | $6,230 |
84 | Karen L Stai Koenigs | Black River Falls, WI 54615 | $6,160 |
85 | Matthew J Wolfe | Mondovi, WI 54755 | $6,060 |
86 | Debra N Schroeder | Nekoosa, WI 54457 | $6,003 |
87 | Radcliffe Brothers LLC | Sparta, WI 54656 | $5,928 |
88 | Paul Dunnigan | Green Bay, WI 54311 | $5,881 |
89 | Vaarendahl Dairy LLC | Black River Falls, WI 54615 | $5,861 |
90 | Emil J Giese | Alma Center, WI 54611 | $5,853 |
91 | Brickstone Dairy Inc | Hixton, WI 54635 | $5,770 |
92 | Jerry A Nelson | San Dimas, CA 91773 | $5,744 |
93 | Clark Nelson | Hixton, WI 54635 | $5,744 |
94 | Peasley Farm LLC | Black River Falls, WI 54615 | $5,738 |
95 | Allan Simonson | Humbird, WI 54746 | $5,598 |
96 | Janke Dairy LLC | Alma Center, WI 54611 | $5,564 |
97 | Alyn D Silberstein | Minneapolis, MN 55409 | $5,543 |
98 | Vernon And Catherine Johnson Revocable Living Trus | Black River Falls, WI 54615 | $5,291 |
99 | Glenn M Johnson | Augusta, WI 54722 | $5,245 |
100 | David Mample | Mahtomedi, MN 55115 | $5,199 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”