Total Commodity Programs in Jackson County, Wisconsin, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 121 to 140 of 1,575
Recipients of Total Commodity Programs from farms in Jackson County, Wisconsin totaled $87,137,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Commodity Programs 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
121 | Rick Olson | Melrose, WI 54642 | $175,519 |
122 | Vaughn T Nehring | Taylor, WI 54659 | $173,287 |
123 | David R Duerkop | Fairchild, WI 54741 | $172,246 |
124 | Steven Boyum | Wanamingo, MN 55983 | $169,561 |
125 | Jeffrey J Guza | Taylor, WI 54659 | $167,232 |
126 | Paul W Giese | Alma Center, WI 54611 | $166,862 |
127 | Bradley B Simonson | Galesville, WI 54630 | $163,524 |
128 | John R Bahnub | Black River Falls, WI 54615 | $160,476 |
129 | Murray Bros | Black River Falls, WI 54615 | $159,942 |
130 | Duane Mark Laufenberg | Alma Center, WI 54611 | $159,772 |
131 | Ellis Ellis & Dallman Inc | Pittsville, WI 54466 | $159,654 |
132 | Green Valley Vu Farms | Alma Center, WI 54611 | $158,992 |
133 | Peasley Farm LLC | Black River Falls, WI 54615 | $158,282 |
134 | Mcnulty Bros | Black River Falls, WI 54615 | $157,711 |
135 | Shawn Capouch | Blair, WI 54616 | $157,674 |
136 | Duane Rice | Black River Falls, WI 54615 | $157,204 |
137 | Gary A Severson | Osseo, WI 54758 | $156,497 |
138 | Palmer Stubrud | Black River Falls, WI 54615 | $155,873 |
139 | Samuel M Mcnulty | Black River Falls, WI 54615 | $154,827 |
140 | Edward A Buchholz | Taylor, WI 54659 | $154,721 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”