Coronavirus Food Assistance Program - Round 2 in Jefferson County, Wisconsin, 2023
Subsidy Recipients 61 to 80 of 82
Recipients of Coronavirus Food Assistance Program - Round 2 from farms in Jefferson County, Wisconsin totaled $312,000 in in 2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Coronavirus Food Assistance Program - Round 2 2023 |
---|---|---|---|
61 | Thomas E Cheesebro - Cheesebro Real Estate Trust | Helenville, WI 53137 | $515 |
62 | Lila Schroedl | Jefferson, WI 53549 | $497 |
63 | Ann Mallow | Ixonia, WI 53036 | $476 |
64 | Nancy J Doherty | Johnson Creek, WI 53038 | $411 |
65 | Ellen Messmer | Jefferson, WI 53549 | $409 |
66 | Hausz Farms LLC | Cambridge, WI 53523 | $379 |
67 | , | $354 | |
68 | Michael R Langholff | Fort Atkinson, WI 53538 | $344 |
69 | Florence Amellia Schultz | Lake Mills, WI 53551 | $330 |
70 | Rachel R Zarling | Port Wing, WI 54865 | $304 |
71 | Susan J Teubert | Fort Atkinson, WI 53538 | $304 |
72 | Sherry Randall | Jefferson, WI 53549 | $291 |
73 | A & K Luebke Farms LLC | Fort Atkinson, WI 53538 | $262 |
74 | Karen Ann Gefvert | Fort Atkinson, WI 53538 | $220 |
75 | Alex Jaeger | Ixonia, WI 53036 | $200 |
76 | Colton Klecker | Jefferson, WI 53549 | $141 |
77 | John L Hausz - John & Carolyn Hausz Family Trust | Fort Atkinson, WI 53538 | $129 |
78 | Andrew M Ascher | Whitewater, WI 53190 | $107 |
79 | Paul Simon | Watertown, WI 53094 | $100 |
80 | Angela Butler | Watertown, WI 53094 | $62 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”