Farm Subsidy information
Jefferson County, Wisconsin
Total Subsidies in Jefferson County, Wisconsin, 2022
Subsidy Recipients 141 to 160 of 264
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in Jefferson County, Wisconsin totaled $6,487,000 in in 2022.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 2022 |
---|---|---|---|
141 | E Robert Gruenwald | Watertown, WI 53094 | $1,763 |
142 | James M Miller | Jefferson, WI 53549 | $1,731 |
143 | William F Stroupe | Fort Atkinson, WI 53538 | $1,661 |
144 | Victor Soderstrom | Oconomowoc, WI 53066 | $1,646 |
145 | Jeanette B Huebner Family Trust | Morgan Hill, CA 95037 | $1,638 |
146 | G C W Schultz Farm Inc | Fort Atkinson, WI 53538 | $1,637 |
147 | Connell Farms LLC | Palmyra, WI 53156 | $1,593 |
148 | Michael L Brandl | Fort Atkinson, WI 53538 | $1,589 |
149 | Joseph J Spoke | Waterloo, WI 53594 | $1,518 |
150 | Donald Horack | Lake Mills, WI 53551 | $1,463 |
151 | Randy Reuhl | Jefferson, WI 53549 | $1,428 |
152 | Dale H Zastrow | Watertown, WI 53094 | $1,426 |
153 | Tom W Kopas | Fort Atkinson, WI 53538 | $1,422 |
154 | Roger A Packard | Lake Mills, WI 53551 | $1,391 |
155 | Imrie Farms LLC | Johnson Creek, WI 53038 | $1,370 |
156 | Peter Hau | Johnson Creek, WI 53038 | $1,352 |
157 | Brian Gunnelson | Cambridge, WI 53523 | $1,292 |
158 | Frank J Vogel | Helenville, WI 53137 | $1,272 |
159 | Glenn W Griebenow | Watertown, WI 53094 | $1,233 |
160 | Erin Dempsey | Fort Atkinson, WI 53538 | $1,225 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”