Crop Disaster Assistance Program in Juneau County, Wisconsin, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 173
Recipients of Crop Disaster Assistance Program from farms in Juneau County, Wisconsin totaled $2,075,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Crop Disaster Assistance Program 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
1 | H & H Cranberries LLC | Nekoosa, WI 54457 | $274,372 |
2 | Moriarty Farms Inc | Mauston, WI 53948 | $100,160 |
3 | Gordon C Schmidt | Wonewoc, WI 53968 | $100,017 |
4 | Walter T Schumer | Mauston, WI 53948 | $88,178 |
5 | Gary Barreau | Mauston, WI 53948 | $85,249 |
6 | Mint Meadow Farms Inc | Camp Douglas, WI 54618 | $80,535 |
7 | B & D Farms | Nekoosa, WI 54457 | $72,922 |
8 | John E Walsh And Sons | Mauston, WI 53948 | $57,675 |
9 | Schroeder Brothers Farms Of Camp | Camp Douglas, WI 54618 | $56,757 |
10 | Carl B Miller | Mauston, WI 53948 | $50,056 |
11 | Ronald Krizan | Camp Douglas, WI 54618 | $44,350 |
12 | Susan Krizan | Camp Douglas, WI 54618 | $44,350 |
13 | Guy D Smith | Mauston, WI 53948 | $38,526 |
14 | Stephen M Kennedy | New Lisbon, WI 53950 | $35,399 |
15 | Samuel I Bell | Tomah, WI 54660 | $35,299 |
16 | Harold H Babcock | Mauston, WI 53948 | $32,191 |
17 | Robert Giebel Sr | Wisconsin Dells, WI 53965 | $31,107 |
18 | Raymond Anderson | New Lisbon, WI 53950 | $26,766 |
19 | David Akerberg | New Lisbon, WI 53950 | $24,888 |
20 | Robert Francis Frisk | New Lisbon, WI 53950 | $24,751 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>