Coronavirus Food Assistance Program - Round 2 in Kenosha County, Wisconsin, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 61 to 80 of 146
Recipients of Coronavirus Food Assistance Program - Round 2 from farms in Kenosha County, Wisconsin totaled $4,074,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Coronavirus Food Assistance Program - Round 2 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
61 | Daniel Weidman | Kenosha, WI 53142 | $17,742 |
62 | Oddball Acres, Inc. | Kansasville, WI 53139 | $16,996 |
63 | Kreuscher Family Farms LLC | Kansasville, WI 53139 | $16,945 |
64 | Pats Services Inc | New Munster, WI 53152 | $15,843 |
65 | Robers Farms LLC | Burlington, WI 53105 | $15,195 |
66 | Holloway Heritage Farms LLC | Union Grove, WI 53182 | $14,943 |
67 | Glenn E Fenske | Kenosha, WI 53144 | $14,230 |
68 | Weis-way Dairy LLC | Union Grove, WI 53182 | $13,801 |
69 | Mark Sheen | Salem, WI 53168 | $13,017 |
70 | Charles O Terry | Kenosha, WI 53144 | $12,367 |
71 | Sharon S Schmeckel | Union Grove, WI 53182 | $12,312 |
72 | James Sheahan | Salem, WI 53168 | $12,266 |
73 | Kevin Muhlenbeck | Kenosha, WI 53144 | $11,819 |
74 | Darren Perona | Kansasville, WI 53139 | $11,647 |
75 | Sok S Lee | Kenosha, WI 53144 | $11,248 |
76 | Donald Lininger | Twin Lakes, WI 53181 | $10,990 |
77 | Mark J Weis | Burlington, WI 53105 | $9,945 |
78 | Lois Holsteins LLC | Burlington, WI 53105 | $9,291 |
79 | James Halladay | Salem, WI 53168 | $9,043 |
80 | J & R Steinbrink Farms LLC | Pleasant Prairie, WI 53158 | $8,630 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”