Coronavirus Food Assistance Program - Round 2 in Kenosha County, Wisconsin, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 101 to 120 of 146
Recipients of Coronavirus Food Assistance Program - Round 2 from farms in Kenosha County, Wisconsin totaled $4,074,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Coronavirus Food Assistance Program - Round 2 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
101 | Scott Van Slochteren | Kenosha, WI 53142 | $4,905 |
102 | Robert Drissel | Union Grove, WI 53182 | $4,524 |
103 | Eugene A Drissel | Union Grove, WI 53182 | $4,524 |
104 | Michael Terry | Kenosha, WI 53144 | $4,510 |
105 | Starry Nights Farm LLC | Burlington, WI 53105 | $4,506 |
106 | Cramer Farm LLC | Mount Pleasant, WI 53403 | $4,398 |
107 | Mark Brand | Burlington, WI 53105 | $4,062 |
108 | James E Brand | Burlington, WI 53105 | $4,062 |
109 | Jeffery A Schaefer | Kenosha, WI 53144 | $3,997 |
110 | Keith Drissel | Union Grove, WI 53182 | $3,950 |
111 | Marvin Drissel | Pleasant Prairie, WI 53158 | $3,950 |
112 | David Reiter | Bristol, WI 53104 | $3,820 |
113 | Joe Kolnik | Kenosha, WI 53144 | $3,813 |
114 | Mark J Terry | Salem, WI 53168 | $3,741 |
115 | David Lininger | Burlington, WI 53105 | $3,733 |
116 | Greg Sheen | Salem, WI 53168 | $3,672 |
117 | Hector Velazquez | Kenosha, WI 53142 | $3,568 |
118 | Ted Sakalowski | Bristol, WI 53104 | $3,406 |
119 | Dakota Siegler | Burlington, WI 53105 | $3,293 |
120 | D Boilini Farms Inc | Lake Geneva, WI 53147 | $3,220 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”