Dairy Programs in Kenosha County, Wisconsin, 1995-2021
Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 104
Recipients of Dairy Programs from farms in Kenosha County, Wisconsin totaled $4,819,000 in from 1995-2021.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Dairy Programs 1995-2021 |
---|---|---|---|
21 | Leonard A Lois Jr | Burlington, WI 53105 | $82,330 |
22 | Keith Wilson | Burlington, WI 53105 | $80,768 |
23 | Eppers Dairy Farm LLC - Matthew Urban Eppers | Kansasville, WI 53139 | $79,537 |
24 | Robert W Crane | Burlington, WI 53105 | $71,653 |
25 | Richard Louis Daly | Kenosha, WI 53144 | $66,814 |
26 | Leroy E Reiter | Bristol, WI 53104 | $55,099 |
27 | Charles Dabbs | Salem, WI 53168 | $53,653 |
28 | Tim Lois | Burlington, WI 53105 | $49,858 |
29 | Joseph Zinser | Kansasville, WI 53139 | $49,607 |
30 | Raymond D Vos | Burlington, WI 53105 | $46,183 |
31 | Ronald B Vos | Burlington, WI 53105 | $46,182 |
32 | John Kevek Farms Inc | Pleasant Prairie, WI 53158 | $43,673 |
33 | James Halladay | Salem, WI 53168 | $40,054 |
34 | Estelle Howell | Union Grove, WI 53182 | $39,697 |
35 | Stephen Robers | Burlington, WI 53105 | $35,586 |
36 | Wtw Eppers Dairy LLC | Kansasville, WI 53139 | $34,381 |
37 | Dwain Karow | Burlington, WI 53105 | $33,009 |
38 | Leland & Bernelda Stohr Revocable | Twin Lakes, WI 53181 | $32,890 |
39 | John Lois | Burlington, WI 53105 | $32,706 |
40 | Hill Bluff Farm Inc | Bristol, WI 53104 | $32,385 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”