Farm Subsidy information
Kenosha County, Wisconsin
Total Subsidies in Kenosha County, Wisconsin, 1995-2021
Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 716
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in Kenosha County, Wisconsin totaled $93,103,000 in from 1995-2021.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 1995-2021 |
---|---|---|---|
21 | Debell Dairy LLC | Salem, WI 53168 | $748,789 |
22 | Robert F Fliess Jr | Kenosha, WI 53144 | $701,887 |
23 | Mark K Edquist | Kenosha, WI 53144 | $682,407 |
24 | James Rogers | Bristol, WI 53104 | $676,246 |
25 | Wayne C Wisnefski | Union Grove, WI 53182 | $662,948 |
26 | Spoerlein Farm's, LLC | Union Grove, WI 53182 | $655,639 |
27 | Charles Tunkieicz Farm Inc | Kenosha, WI 53144 | $622,888 |
28 | Ked Partners | Kenosha, WI 53144 | $598,168 |
29 | Ronald & Raymond Vos Farms | Burlington, WI 53105 | $593,831 |
30 | Justin C Weis | Kenosha, WI 53142 | $559,664 |
31 | Joseph A Vos | Burlington, WI 53105 | $556,037 |
32 | Elfering Farms LLC | Kenosha, WI 53142 | $527,435 |
33 | Kuiper Family Farms | Union Grove, WI 53182 | $514,317 |
34 | Leonard A Lois Jr | Burlington, WI 53105 | $510,415 |
35 | Allan R Zirbel | Salem, WI 53168 | $506,535 |
36 | Run N Deere Farms | Burlington, WI 53105 | $480,231 |
37 | Thelen Sand & Gravel | Twin Lakes, WI 53181 | $455,610 |
38 | Reynolds Family Farms LLC | Genoa City, WI 53128 | $450,414 |
39 | Keith Wilson | Burlington, WI 53105 | $443,214 |
40 | John P Steinbrink | Pleasant Prairie, WI 53158 | $437,614 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”