Farm Subsidy information
La Crosse County, Wisconsin
Total Subsidies in La Crosse County, Wisconsin, 2023
Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 227
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in La Crosse County, Wisconsin totaled $3,747,000 in in 2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 2023 |
---|---|---|---|
21 | Dale Urbanek | Cashton, WI 54619 | $39,535 |
22 | Thomas Miller | La Crosse, WI 54601 | $39,090 |
23 | Troy Schomburg | Bangor, WI 54614 | $38,970 |
24 | Clements Custom Ag LLC | Coon Valley, WI 54623 | $38,057 |
25 | Benjamin Horstman | Bangor, WI 54614 | $36,182 |
26 | Donald Langrehr | West Salem, WI 54669 | $35,558 |
27 | Steven Nuttleman | Bangor, WI 54614 | $32,932 |
28 | Douglas Krueger | Mindoro, WI 54644 | $32,730 |
29 | S And J Skemp Family LLC | La Crosse, WI 54601 | $30,137 |
30 | Corbin Rhodes | West Salem, WI 54669 | $29,036 |
31 | Ernie Hoffman | West Salem, WI 54669 | $28,824 |
32 | James Kroener | Bangor, WI 54614 | $28,702 |
33 | Alex Schlintz | Bangor, WI 54614 | $27,507 |
34 | Randy Muenzenberger | Coon Valley, WI 54623 | $26,960 |
35 | Jacob Miller | West Salem, WI 54669 | $25,336 |
36 | Dustin Anderson | Mindoro, WI 54644 | $25,228 |
37 | Thomas Schaub | Rockland, WI 54653 | $23,312 |
38 | Starks Rolling Acres Inc | Sparta, WI 54656 | $23,066 |
39 | William Korn | Cashton, WI 54619 | $22,811 |
40 | Janet Kloppenburg | Bangor, WI 54614 | $20,616 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”