Coronavirus Food Assistance Program - Round 1 in La Crosse County, Wisconsin, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 61 to 80 of 215
Recipients of Coronavirus Food Assistance Program - Round 1 from farms in La Crosse County, Wisconsin totaled $3,841,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Coronavirus Food Assistance Program - Round 1 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
61 | Sue Rowe | West Salem, WI 54669 | $14,528 |
62 | Gilster Farms | Bangor, WI 54614 | $14,367 |
63 | Paul Hammes | La Crosse, WI 54601 | $13,325 |
64 | Roy Koltermann | West Salem, WI 54669 | $13,234 |
65 | Golden Acres Grain Farms LLC | West Salem, WI 54669 | $13,231 |
66 | Janet Kloppenburg | Bangor, WI 54614 | $12,932 |
67 | Bart Horstman | Bangor, WI 54614 | $12,773 |
68 | John Stasiak | Holmen, WI 54636 | $12,217 |
69 | Bernard Roesler | Coon Valley, WI 54623 | $12,138 |
70 | Randy Schmidt | Bangor, WI 54614 | $12,133 |
71 | Donald Langrehr | West Salem, WI 54669 | $12,077 |
72 | Bryan Berg | Coon Valley, WI 54623 | $11,934 |
73 | David Fennigkoh | West Salem, WI 54669 | $11,321 |
74 | Randy Muenzenberger | Coon Valley, WI 54623 | $10,819 |
75 | Matthew Hoth | Bangor, WI 54614 | $10,775 |
76 | Jeffrey Heuer | Bangor, WI 54614 | $10,657 |
77 | Jacob Miller | West Salem, WI 54669 | $10,601 |
78 | David Steiger | La Crosse, WI 54601 | $10,362 |
79 | James Malin | La Crosse, WI 54601 | $10,062 |
80 | Sara Marsolek | West Salem, WI 54669 | $9,948 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”