Farm Subsidy information
La Crosse County, Wisconsin
Total Subsidies in La Crosse County, Wisconsin, 2022
Subsidy Recipients 61 to 80 of 226
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in La Crosse County, Wisconsin totaled $2,274,000 in in 2022.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 2022 |
---|---|---|---|
61 | Joann R Bredemann Estate | La Crosse, WI 54601 | $5,500 |
62 | Benjamin Baker | West Salem, WI 54669 | $5,325 |
63 | Ersani LLC | Nevada, IA 50201 | $5,263 |
64 | Donald C And Karen R Heidel Joint Revocable Trust | La Crosse, WI 54601 | $5,230 |
65 | Randy Muenzenberger | Coon Valley, WI 54623 | $5,193 |
66 | Dean Proper | Coon Valley, WI 54623 | $4,906 |
67 | Jeffrey Stumlin | Holmen, WI 54636 | $4,843 |
68 | Paul Hammes | La Crosse, WI 54601 | $4,838 |
69 | Daniel Korn | Cashton, WI 54619 | $4,829 |
70 | Janet Kloppenburg | Bangor, WI 54614 | $4,734 |
71 | Richard Norman | West Salem, WI 54669 | $4,644 |
72 | Shari Bockenhauer | Mindoro, WI 54644 | $4,595 |
73 | , | $4,562 | |
74 | Jerome Pedretti | Holmen, WI 54636 | $4,556 |
75 | Mark Mulder | Sparta, WI 54656 | $4,516 |
76 | Dennis M Anderson | Bangor, WI 54614 | $4,207 |
77 | Darrel Evenson | West Salem, WI 54669 | $4,015 |
78 | Charles Storandt | Mindoro, WI 54644 | $3,931 |
79 | Michael Kendhammer | La Crosse, WI 54601 | $3,921 |
80 | Gary Ruhser | Holmen, WI 54636 | $3,914 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”