Farm Subsidy information
La Crosse County, Wisconsin
Total Subsidies in La Crosse County, Wisconsin, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 121 to 140 of 1,916
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in La Crosse County, Wisconsin totaled $91,259,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
121 | Joel Craig | Mindoro, WI 54644 | $165,776 |
122 | Elm Mound Farms Custom Harvesting | Bangor, WI 54614 | $165,771 |
123 | Mark Schomberg | La Crosse, WI 54601 | $163,162 |
124 | Jon Labus | West Salem, WI 54669 | $162,380 |
125 | Starks Rolling Acres Inc | Sparta, WI 54656 | $162,065 |
126 | Paul Lash Jr | Mindoro, WI 54644 | $161,065 |
127 | Todd Trocinski | Holmen, WI 54636 | $160,485 |
128 | Gary Spangler | Holmen, WI 54636 | $159,694 |
129 | Ryan Manke | West Salem, WI 54669 | $157,912 |
130 | Clements Custom Ag LLC | Coon Valley, WI 54623 | $156,819 |
131 | Ervin Nuttleman Jr | Bangor, WI 54614 | $155,647 |
132 | Richard Kleinsmith | Holmen, WI 54636 | $153,380 |
133 | Betty Kroener | Bangor, WI 54614 | $153,214 |
134 | Robert Skemp | La Crosse, WI 54602 | $152,928 |
135 | Alex Schlintz | Bangor, WI 54614 | $152,594 |
136 | Dale Young | Mindoro, WI 54644 | $151,415 |
137 | Judith K Ruedy | Bangor, WI 54614 | $151,305 |
138 | David Dowiasch | Coon Valley, WI 54623 | $149,782 |
139 | Arlan Dowiasch | Coon Valley, WI 54623 | $149,481 |
140 | Richard Oldenburg | West Salem, WI 54669 | $147,759 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”