Farm Subsidy information
La Crosse County, Wisconsin
Total Subsidies in La Crosse County, Wisconsin, 2020
Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 445
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in La Crosse County, Wisconsin totaled $9,234,000 in in 2020.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 2020 |
---|---|---|---|
21 | Steven Nuttleman | Bangor, WI 54614 | $87,198 |
22 | Farm Services Agency ** | Washington, DC 20250 | $80,280 |
23 | Joseph P Gerke | Bangor, WI 54614 | $74,670 |
24 | Michael Hoyer | West Salem, WI 54669 | $74,005 |
25 | Jeffrey Servais | La Crosse, WI 54601 | $73,551 |
26 | Todd Servais | La Crosse, WI 54601 | $73,551 |
27 | Charles Storandt | Mindoro, WI 54644 | $70,980 |
28 | Octagon Farms Of Barre Mills LLC | La Crosse, WI 54601 | $69,998 |
29 | Ernie Hoffman | West Salem, WI 54669 | $68,685 |
30 | Clements Custom Ag LLC | Coon Valley, WI 54623 | $63,272 |
31 | Troy Schomburg | Bangor, WI 54614 | $61,312 |
32 | Dmw Farms LLC | West Salem, WI 54669 | $61,039 |
33 | Antony Farms | Bangor, WI 54614 | $59,739 |
34 | Randy Mikshowsky | Bangor, WI 54614 | $59,568 |
35 | Michael Piske | Bangor, WI 54614 | $57,080 |
36 | Ryan Manke | West Salem, WI 54669 | $56,899 |
37 | David C Pfaff | Mindoro, WI 54644 | $55,213 |
38 | Todd Trocinski | Holmen, WI 54636 | $53,931 |
39 | Dale Urbanek | Cashton, WI 54619 | $52,192 |
40 | Darlene Dovenberg | West Salem, WI 54669 | $52,113 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”