Total Conservation Programs in La Crosse County, Wisconsin, 2022
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 128
Recipients of Total Conservation Programs from farms in La Crosse County, Wisconsin totaled $324,000 in in 2022.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Conservation Programs 2022 |
---|---|---|---|
1 | Three Brothers Coulee Farm LLC | Onalaska, WI 54650 | $13,815 |
2 | Sidney Jerome | Bangor, WI 54614 | $11,836 |
3 | Aben Farms LLC | West Salem, WI 54669 | $11,091 |
4 | Hansen Hills | Bangor, WI 54614 | $9,481 |
5 | Keith Dennehy | Winona, MN 55987 | $9,271 |
6 | , | $8,599 | |
7 | Joseph Silha | Madison, WI 53718 | $8,591 |
8 | Ronald Jernander | Rockland, WI 54653 | $8,140 |
9 | Darlene Dovenberg | West Salem, WI 54669 | $7,982 |
10 | Sand Creek Property LLC | Oconomowoc, WI 53066 | $7,132 |
11 | Agnes Bouska | Bangor, WI 54614 | $6,570 |
12 | Don Numsen | Rockland, WI 54653 | $6,463 |
13 | Samuel Arentz | Rockland, WI 54653 | $6,290 |
14 | Patricia Kammel | Coon Valley, WI 54623 | $6,063 |
15 | , | $5,752 | |
16 | Joann R Bredemann Estate | La Crosse, WI 54601 | $5,500 |
17 | Benjamin Baker | West Salem, WI 54669 | $5,325 |
18 | Donald C And Karen R Heidel Joint Revocable Trust | La Crosse, WI 54601 | $5,230 |
19 | Dean Proper | Coon Valley, WI 54623 | $4,906 |
20 | Daniel Korn | Cashton, WI 54619 | $4,829 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>