Total Commodity Programs in Lafayette County, Wisconsin, 2022
Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 211
Recipients of Total Commodity Programs from farms in Lafayette County, Wisconsin totaled $1,183,000 in in 2022.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Commodity Programs 2022 |
---|---|---|---|
21 | Vosberg Valley View Farm Inc | South Wayne, WI 53587 | $13,617 |
22 | Thunderbranch Acres Inc | Darlington, WI 53530 | $13,027 |
23 | Rielly Family Farm LLC | Darlington, WI 53530 | $12,567 |
24 | Robert W Fitzsimons | Darlington, WI 53530 | $12,369 |
25 | Matt J Berget | Gratiot, WI 53541 | $12,304 |
26 | Nicholas J Geyer | Cuba City, WI 53807 | $12,284 |
27 | Davis Family Farm LLC | Darlington, WI 53530 | $11,403 |
28 | Steve Wonders | Mineral Point, WI 53565 | $10,935 |
29 | Michael J Martin | Mineral Point, WI 53565 | $10,923 |
30 | Wiegel Riverside Dairy LLC | South Wayne, WI 53587 | $10,452 |
31 | Highway Dairy Farms LLC | Darlington, WI 53530 | $10,452 |
32 | Wessel Farms LLC | Mineral Point, WI 53565 | $10,452 |
33 | R&r Farms Partnership | Hazel Green, WI 53811 | $10,452 |
34 | Holmesville Dairy LLC | Argyle, WI 53504 | $10,452 |
35 | Cottonwood Dairy LLC | South Wayne, WI 53587 | $10,452 |
36 | Terrance L Cox | Shullsburg, WI 53586 | $10,452 |
37 | Joseph L Wedig | Darlington, WI 53530 | $10,452 |
38 | Stephen D Carpenter | Darlington, WI 53530 | $10,452 |
39 | Thomas E Douglas | Belmont, WI 53510 | $10,452 |
40 | Destin J Komprood | Darlington, WI 53530 | $10,452 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”