Total Conservation Programs in Lafayette County, Wisconsin, 2022
Subsidy Recipients 41 to 60 of 331
Recipients of Total Conservation Programs from farms in Lafayette County, Wisconsin totaled $3,271,000 in in 2022.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Conservation Programs 2022 |
---|---|---|---|
41 | John W Larson | Argyle, WI 53504 | $22,656 |
42 | Streich Capital LLC | Platteville, WI 53818 | $22,638 |
43 | Gary K Siegenthaler | Darlington, WI 53530 | $22,360 |
44 | , | $22,282 | |
45 | Albert E Ryckman -albert E Ryckman Revocable Trust | Albany, OR 97321 | $21,997 |
46 | Karl Gant | Blanchardville, WI 53516 | $21,860 |
47 | Michael W Burbach | Mineral Point, WI 53565 | $20,777 |
48 | Steven Rear | Argyle, WI 53504 | $20,588 |
49 | Steve Roelli | Platteville, WI 53818 | $20,510 |
50 | David J Houtakker | Cuba City, WI 53807 | $20,456 |
51 | Hardyman Farm LLC | Mineral Point, WI 53565 | $20,189 |
52 | Robert Prestbroten | Blanchardville, WI 53516 | $20,001 |
53 | Richard J Leahy | Middleton, WI 53562 | $19,682 |
54 | Mary Kurth | Darlington, WI 53530 | $18,625 |
55 | Donald P Wedig | Mineral Point, WI 53565 | $18,469 |
56 | Richard Kundert | Blanchardville, WI 53516 | $17,899 |
57 | Andergard, LLC | Verona, WI 53593 | $17,432 |
58 | Todd K Doro LLC | Franklin, WI 53132 | $17,359 |
59 | Norbert J Krusiec | Mc Farland, WI 53558 | $17,250 |
60 | Andrews Revocable Trust Dated June 11 2010 - Matth | Cuba City, WI 53807 | $17,119 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”