Miscellaneous Conservation Programs in Lafayette County, Wisconsin, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 81 to 100 of 105
Recipients of Miscellaneous Conservation Programs from farms in Lafayette County, Wisconsin totaled $210,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Miscellaneous Conservation Programs 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
81 | Kenneth Van Bogaert | Darlington, WI 53530 | $217 |
82 | Robert Crump | Indianapolis, IN 46280 | $212 |
83 | Thomas Black | Shullsburg, WI 53586 | $211 |
84 | Samuel C Hanson | Blanchardville, WI 53516 | $203 |
85 | Ronald Orville Debuhr | Belmont, WI 53510 | $197 |
86 | Roger Davis | Beloit, WI 53511 | $196 |
87 | Dan Davis | Janesville, WI 53545 | $196 |
88 | Sheldon Krahenbuhl | Darlington, WI 53530 | $186 |
89 | Steven Broge | Monroe, WI 53566 | $184 |
90 | Randall Huntington | Darlington, WI 53530 | $183 |
91 | Ronald S Niemann | Blanchardville, WI 53516 | $180 |
92 | Michael Joseph Marr | Mineral Point, WI 53565 | $178 |
93 | Clement Marr | Mineral Point, WI 53565 | $178 |
94 | Joseph Leahy | Darlington, WI 53530 | $151 |
95 | Chester Hanson | Argyle, WI 53504 | $148 |
96 | Elston Miller | Warren, IL 61087 | $137 |
97 | George Cederberg | Argyle, WI 53504 | $121 |
98 | Karen Mckee | Stockton, IL 61085 | $107 |
99 | Janice Geach | Mundelein, IL 60060 | $107 |
100 | Jeffrey Cline | Apple River, IL 61001 | $107 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”