Total Commodity Programs in Lafayette County, Wisconsin, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 81 to 100 of 2,896
Recipients of Total Commodity Programs from farms in Lafayette County, Wisconsin totaled $267,934,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Commodity Programs 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
81 | Greg Roelli | Darlington, WI 53530 | $653,199 |
82 | Michael J Martin | Mineral Point, WI 53565 | $645,459 |
83 | Robert F Leitzinger | Shullsburg, WI 53586 | $640,917 |
84 | Kamps Brothers Inc | Cuba City, WI 53807 | $639,944 |
85 | Jack L Redfearn | Hazel Green, WI 53811 | $633,367 |
86 | Christensen Farms LLC | Belmont, WI 53510 | $623,626 |
87 | David Gertsch | Gratiot, WI 53541 | $623,282 |
88 | Mar Mic Farms Inc | Cuba City, WI 53807 | $611,694 |
89 | Bellmann-schwab Farms | Cuba City, WI 53807 | $603,163 |
90 | Schubert Farms Inc | Mineral Point, WI 53565 | $595,538 |
91 | Douglas Ray Gierhart | Argyle, WI 53504 | $585,411 |
92 | James E Kautz | Darlington, WI 53530 | $574,361 |
93 | Richard March | Shullsburg, WI 53586 | $565,811 |
94 | Vosberg Valley View Farm Inc | South Wayne, WI 53587 | $563,384 |
95 | Buchs Farms LLC | Belmont, WI 53510 | $554,873 |
96 | Craig A Komprood | Darlington, WI 53530 | $551,466 |
97 | Whiteside Farms LLC | Argyle, WI 53504 | $550,398 |
98 | Kenneth J Weiskircher | Shullsburg, WI 53586 | $548,765 |
99 | Steven H Diedrich | Gratiot, WI 53541 | $547,932 |
100 | David A Diedrich | Scales Mound, IL 61075 | $545,944 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”