Dairy Programs in Lafayette County, Wisconsin, 2023
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 107
Recipients of Dairy Programs from farms in Lafayette County, Wisconsin totaled $5,868,000 in in 2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Dairy Programs 2023 |
---|---|---|---|
1 | Schilling Farms LLC | Darlington, WI 53530 | $150,934 |
2 | Cottonwood Dairy LLC | South Wayne, WI 53587 | $149,794 |
3 | Highway Dairy Farms LLC | Darlington, WI 53530 | $149,582 |
4 | Stephen D Carpenter | Darlington, WI 53530 | $147,106 |
5 | Davis Family Farm LLC | Darlington, WI 53530 | $143,363 |
6 | Holmesville Dairy LLC | Argyle, WI 53504 | $138,753 |
7 | Wessel Farms LLC | Mineral Point, WI 53565 | $135,472 |
8 | Joseph L Wedig | Darlington, WI 53530 | $129,224 |
9 | Thomas E Douglas | Belmont, WI 53510 | $128,436 |
10 | Nathan J Kliebenstein | Darlington, WI 53530 | $128,130 |
11 | Steve Cernek | Gratiot, WI 53541 | $123,594 |
12 | Terrance L Cox | Shullsburg, WI 53586 | $123,374 |
13 | R&r Farms Partnership | Hazel Green, WI 53811 | $123,022 |
14 | Endless Horizons Inc | Cuba City, WI 53807 | $122,269 |
15 | Rielly Family Farm LLC | Darlington, WI 53530 | $121,250 |
16 | Destin J Komprood | Darlington, WI 53530 | $120,981 |
17 | Thomas M Fitzsimons Sr | Darlington, WI 53530 | $120,918 |
18 | Nicholas J Geyer | Cuba City, WI 53807 | $119,006 |
19 | Alan Ruf | Darlington, WI 53530 | $96,458 |
20 | Thunderbranch Acres Inc | Darlington, WI 53530 | $96,226 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>